WilliamLam.com

What's New Whitepapers for vSphere 6.0 Platform, VSAN 6.0 & others

by // 6 Comments

With the announcement vSphere 6.0, I am sure many of you are curious to learn more about the new features and capabilities in vSphere which includes a major update to Virtual SAN dubbed VSAN 6.0. From what I saw on Twitter yesterday, the blogosphere was on fire yesterday with so much content which was awesome but I also did notice quite a bit of incorrect information being posted. I suspect some of this information was based on earlier vSphere Beta's while others, I am really not sure where they got their information because it was not even mentioned in the Beta's. Remember, that not everything in the vSphere Beta will be released in the final product.

In any case, for the definitive source of What's New in vSphere 6.0, I would highly recommend everyone check out both new whitepapers for vSphere 6.0 Platform as well as VSAN 6.0 as they will contain all the details of what will be available at GA. Below are the direct links for the whitepapers as I did not find it on the Technical Whitepapers section of VMware.com which I suspect is still being updated.

Feedback needed for the future of VCSIM

by // 2 Comments

Last week, I had a chance to catchup with a couple of folks over in our Performance Engineering team to talk about VCSIM. For those of you who have not heard of VCSIM before or would like to know how to get started, I highly recommend you check out this article here and here for more details. We had a discussion on a variety of topics including how I and some of our customers are using VCSIM today.

As some of you already know, VCSIM is an internal tool originally developed by VMware Engineering for a very specific set of use cases, it was never intended to be used by our customers. Having said that, I think after talking to Engineering, they understood the value in having such a tool which could be useful to both our customers and partners. In fact, I have even shared a couple of use cases that I believe VCSIM can greatly benefit everyone:

  • Exploring and learning about the vSphere API and the basic inventory hierarchy of vSphere objects
  • Environment to develop and create various inventory reporting scripts (vCLI, PowerCLI, etc)
  • Developing performance metric gathering tools
  • Developing vSphere Web Client plugins and being able visualize large inventory of objects

There were some thoughts on how VCSIM could evolve over time from its current implementation as it was designed for a very specific purpose, but it was too early to tell and it would be based on some assumptions. Instead, I thought it might be useful to get feedback into Engineering so they could better understand how VCSIM was currently being used today. To help with this, I have created a very short survey below or you can also directly access it using the link here. Please take a few minutes to provide some feedback on how you currently use VCSIM today. Thanks in advance!

Additional VCSIM Resources:

Why is my VSAN Component maximum showing less than 3000?

by // Leave a Comment

This is a question that I have seen come up on several occasions in both the VMTN Community forums as well as in our internal Socialcast group. I have not seen anyone blog about this topic yet and figure I would share the answer since this was a question I had asked myself when I had initially setup VSAN. If you are not familiar with VSAN Components, I highly recommend you check out Cormac Hogan's blog article VSAN Part 4: Understanding Objects and Components.

In vSphere 5.5 Update 1, the maximum number of supported components for VSAN is 3000 which is a per ESXi host maximum. What some folks are noticing when they run the RVC vsan.check_limits command on their VSAN Cluster, they are finding out that the maximum is coming up much lower as seen in the example below.

/localhost/VSAN-Datacenter/computers> vsan.check_limits VSAN-Cluster/
2015-01-28 15:34:25 +0000: Gathering stats from all hosts ...
2015-01-28 15:34:27 +0000: Gathering disks info ...
+--------------------------------+-------------------+-------------------------------------------+
| Host                           | RDT               | Disks                                     |
+--------------------------------+-------------------+-------------------------------------------+
| vesxi55-3.primp-industries.com | Assocs: 30/20000  | Components: 8/750                         |
|                                | Sockets: 17/10000 | naa.6000c2932c3f51f04e4cd395f4a11752: 8%  |
|                                | Clients: 3        | naa.6000c294f6496a99ad756857b9b06f01: 0%  |
|                                | Owners: 5         |                                           |
| vesxi55-2.primp-industries.com | Assocs: 10/20000  | Components: 8/750                         |
|                                | Sockets: 13/10000 | naa.6000c294bde5987d60398e0305978b00: 9%  |
|                                | Clients: 0        | naa.6000c292a964255b82410099360a9b27: 0%  |
|                                | Owners: 0         |                                           |
| vesxi55-1.primp-industries.com | Assocs: 24/20000  | Components: 8/750                         |
|                                | Sockets: 15/10000 | naa.6000c298b69006b820e367b5fde97cbf: 11% |
|                                | Clients: 3        | naa.6000c29db3f272cfb7fb4d08bffad3ab: 0%  |
|                                | Owners: 3         |                                           |
+--------------------------------+-------------------+-------------------------------------------+

The reason for this is actually due to the amount of physical memory available to each ESXi host. If you are running VSAN in a Nested ESXi environment like I am in the example above, I only have 8GB of memory configured for each ESXi host. The number of supported VSAN Components will definitely differ from an actual physical host with more memory and the nice thing about vsan.check_limits command is that it is dynamic in nature based on the actual available resources. Funny enough, the majority of the questions actually came from folks who ran VSAN in a Nested Environment, so this would explain why this question keeps popping up.

If I run the same RVC command on an environment where VSAN was running on real hardware with a decent amount of memory which most modern systems these days have, then I can see the VSAN Component maximum is properly displaying the 3000 limit as expected in the example below.

/localhost/datacenter01/computers> vsan.check_limits vsan-cluster01/
2015-01-28 15:28:47 +0000: Querying limit stats from all hosts ...
2015-01-28 15:28:49 +0000: Fetching VSAN disk info from esx021.vmwcs.com (may take a moment) ...
2015-01-28 15:28:49 +0000: Fetching VSAN disk info from esx022.vmwcs.com (may take a moment) ...
2015-01-28 15:28:49 +0000: Fetching VSAN disk info from esx024.vmwcs.com (may take a moment) ...
2015-01-28 15:28:51 +0000: Done fetching VSAN disk infos
+---------------------------+--------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Host                      | RDT                | Disks                                                                           |
+---------------------------+--------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| esx021.vmwcs.com          | Assocs: 223/45000  | Components: 97/3000                                                             |
|                           | Sockets: 132/10000 | t10.ATA_____WDC_WD1002FAEX2D00Z3A0________________________WD2DWCATRC061926: 18% |
|                           | Clients: 14        | t10.ATA_____KINGSTON_SH103S3480G__________________00_50026B7226017C69____: 0%   |
|                           | Owners: 29         |                                                                                 |
| esx022.vmwcs.com          | Assocs: 252/45000  | Components: 96/3000                                                             |
|                           | Sockets: 143/10000 | t10.ATA_____KINGSTON_SH103S3480G__________________00_50026B7226017CA2____: 0%   |
|                           | Clients: 14        | t10.ATA_____WDC_WD1002FAEX2D00Z3A0________________________WD2DWCATRC050466: 19% |
|                           | Owners: 38         |                                                                                 |
| esx024.vmwcs.com          | Assocs: 197/45000  | Components: 96/3000                                                             |
|                           | Sockets: 122/10000 | t10.ATA_____ST2000DL0032D9VT166__________________________________5YD73PRP: 8%   |
|                           | Clients: 17        | t10.ATA_____KINGSTON_SH103S3480G__________________00_50026B7226017C5B____: 0%   |
|                           | Owners: 22         |                                                                                 |
+---------------------------+--------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

The lesson here is that even though I am a huge supporter of using Nested ESXi to learn about new products, features and how they work from a functional perspective, there is no amount of Nested ESXi testing that can ever replace actual testing of real hardware.